When we think of heroic Ashes moments, it is often the rearguard action and riposte that lives longest in the memory.
The resolute bravery of Monty Panesar in the first test at Sofia Gardens in 2009 to secure a famous draw that underpinned a 2-1 series win is one such example, and of course we must never forget that it was Jack Leach’s 1 not out that served as the perfect foil and contrast to Ben Stokes’ swashbuckling batting at Headingly in 2019. Each delivery fended off by Leach drew the same excitement as Stokes thrashing the ball over the boundary rope.
Panesar and Leach have more in common than these heroics and even their spin bowling. They were, like more than 20 other senior men’s international cricketers, both products of the University Centres of Cricketing Excellence (UCCE) programme.
First established in 2000 by the ECB, and subsequently supported by the MCC (as MCCU), the UCCE programme has been celebrated as a case study in the value of partnership between a sport’s governing body and universities. More recently the blossoming of BUCS (British Universities and Colleges Sport) Super Rugby has shown this potential in another light with crowds to rival the Prem Rugby, and over 40 BUCS competition alumni competing in the 2025 Women’s World Cup.
Yet as the first ball is bowled in the Ashes this week, university cricket is facing the challenge of restructuring its top-end competition and player development programmes following the decision to end the highly successful UCCE programme by the ECB (England and Wales Cricket Board) earlier this year.
The investment of a c.£200,000 per year budget of the UCCE programme enabled talented young cricketers to train and study, harnessing the potential of higher education institutions to provide a finishing school for players whilst supporting their development holistically.
Much like the top level of English cricket, several high-profile players from the UCCE programme have had great success in the men’s and women’s Hundred, therefore proving that university cricket is very much part of the contemporary and future economy of the sport in this country.
The UCCE programme saw hundreds of players honed and prepared for both a life in professional cricket and prepared for a career post-cricket under the dual-career model.
Described by one Director of Sport as, “a sport that was once the envy of other sports in the higher education sector as there were previously clear alignment and funding,” these programmes are now scrabbling to support their student-athletes and are determined to sustain the level of support available to them. The UCCE model had seen exceptional collaboration between institutions and the creation of cross-institution teams to enable each centre to be student-athlete focussed rather than about the institution itself. This collaboration was such that it even saw the infamous ‘BUCS Points’ table accommodate these idiosyncrasies in the interest of student-athlete development.“
Whilst the same Director of Sport reflects that the demise of investment in UCCE, “may need further examination as to why this is now the case and ‘what went wrong” this removal of funding at a time of unprecedented financial challenge in the higher education sector.”
So, what next for university cricket? The institutions are resolute, solution-finding as they go. Some fortunate to be able to build upon existing partnerships to sustain their programme and provide the added value of UCCE with the support of wider stakeholders in the sport. At BUCS we are working with our members to ensure that the demise of the UCCE does not compromise the competitiveness of and value of university cricket.
Subscribe to the Sport Industry Daily for regular updates on the biggest stories and latest news in the sport industry.
Sign up today for the latest news in one daily email, plus occasional event updates, direct to your inbox
University Cricket: A phoenix to rise from the ashes of UCCE – Sport Industry Group
Related articles




